XBOXONE + TITANFALL + Another game for £399, Kick in the nuts for the early adopters?

I'm sure i will be having a better experience playing Titanfall on my PC than the XB1

 

[quote user="Alchemist Don"]

I'm sure i will be having a better experience playing Titanfall on my PC than the XB1

[/quote]The Xbox one (2003) has such few games that it's obviously an exciting time for the low-end XB1 owner.

But not for a PC Gamer. It's on Origin, published by EA. There's no server browser, that's completely terrible. It's 6vs6 console trash because XB1 is too weak to handle more players than 12 on a map at once. PC gamers have to suffer again due to console
peasant gamer limits. It's effectively stopped it from being a 64 player PC master race game and it's on Origin, published by EA. Weapons have no recoil, or spray patterns and it has ADS, it's another generic shooter with regenerating health and a low skill
ceiling. It's a digital game, on origin, published by EA; when the servers inevitably close you don't even get to toss it in the garbage can. I give it 3 months before the PC community drops this game as it only appeals to people that like Space Marines running
on walls.

 

They tried the game with more players than 6vs6. It worked fine but was too much.

Respawn tried 12vs12, 10vs10 ,etc but 6vs6 was the best fit for the game.

Gears was 4vs4 and noone kicked off about that.............

 

I will most likely get bored of with it within a couple of weeks like i do with most FPS its only friends that keep me playing them.

 

^^^ tbh Don, I'm the same.

 

[quote user="Fear the Doctor"]Gears was 4vs4 and no one kicked off about that[/quote]That was also on the 360. It is as I've said before, people are expecting better than the 360 by default.

Of course 6v6 is better than 4v4, so perhaps expectations need to be scaled down.

 

Why are people still harping on about this 6v6 thing?

.

The game was designed to be that way... more players doesn't mean better, anyone with half a brain cell understands this.

.

If they released a new Rainbow Six game and it was 24 or 32 a side everyone would be "ewww" or "wtf?"... it would be TERRIBLE!

.

Honestly, some people will try to troll over any pointless thing.

 

It was a decision to keep the gameplay fast and balanced nothing to do with system limitations, more players doesn't guarantee a better game experience.

 

Having played the hell outta the beta, the player count coupled with the AI is spot on for the size and design of the maps

EDIT - I really hate bumping this thread as it should've been locked ages ago..

 

To the Forum Police,

Dont paint everyone with the same brush. Read the thread. Someone had a go at me first,just because i posted negative comments about the xbone. And my other gamertag is silver,so the only difference with this one is about 40,000 gamerscore.. What pulled
me in to the 360 was pgr3. Thats a game i WANTED to play. And i still by that......

 

Ross if you have issues with the forums then please feel free to take this up in PM with me. You may not have thrown the first stone but fueling a fire only makes it bigger. I have locked this thread because it has become a little hostile. That, and there
is a thread over in the X1 section that pretty much covers the same concept as this one. You guys are all pretty fantastic but please keep in mind that the best way to deal with a bad thread is to ignore the bad posts. You all know if you ever need a chat
or have any concerns, that my inbox is always open to you. Sorry to you all for not catching this sooner.