How do people win within a couple seconds on solitaire?

[quote user="LegendOfGta"]

All I'm saying is the success rate of completing Survival on Aim Assist is 10% better than doing it on Free Aim, and since the whole point of this game is to earn money and RP, that means that completion of Survival will yield the most RP and Money than
any other wave. Therefore, in conclusion, in order to get to this final wave, it is imperative to ensure that you have the advantage over the AI, which in this case will kill you within three seconds within that that one second it takes to adjust the X and
Y coordinate of your aim rather than to "snap" to it in a millisecond.

[/quote]

I 100% agree. However he may feel the meaning of playing survival and winning is doing it without aim assist. The point of the game is to win. How you do that is up to you.

[quote user="Borss39"]

[quote user="Mister Chompski"]

There's not much incentive to win. You can get more points by killing and losing than winning and have dedicated yourself to only scoring objectives with kills here and then when needed.

[/quote]

The incentive to win is that's the POINT of the game.

[/quote]

Enjoyment is the point of the game. Many do it by winning. Some do it by stats. Some do it by personal goals. Some just play to play.



Some do it with little or no regards to what their win/lose performance is when bunched up with random people they don't know. Randoms that could help you win when you didn't perform well and make you lose when you personally
did well.



Some joke that KDR doesn't get you the ladies. Neither does W/L. Some people care equally as little about rather they win as some do about how someone performs within a team solely as an individual.

Me and my friends played Halo two for hours every day. You are remembering that people could cheat to get their rank up, but you are incorrectly remembering how.

...

It was called boosting and basically all you did was you and the people who want to win get in one party, and the people who will let you win get in another party. You have the party leader of each party call eachother. By talking on the phone they would
start the search at the same time, they would then tell eachother the exact second they found people and how many. If they both saw the same thing, they most likely found eachother, if not they would back out and try again. Once in the game the one team would
just let the other team win. They would do this until the one team got to their highest rank.

Or they would just get a modder and a bridger. The bridger would bridge host to the modder and the modder would just win the game in a few seconds.

...

But with the amount of people that are playing each video game at the same time, this would be nearly impossible to do these days.

[quote user="Mister Chompski"]

[quote user="Borss39"]

[quote user="Mister Chompski"]

There's not much incentive to win. You can get more points by killing and losing than winning and have dedicated yourself to only scoring objectives with kills here and then when needed.

[/quote]

The incentive to win is that's the POINT of the game.

[/quote]

Enjoyment is the point of the game. Many do it by winning. Some do it by stats. Some do it by personal goals. Some just play to play.



Some do it with little or no regards to what their win/lose performance is when bunched up with random people they don't know. Randoms that could help you win when you didn't perform well and make you lose when you personally
did well.



Some joke that KDR doesn't get you the ladies. Neither does W/L. Some people care equally as little about rather they win as some do about how someone performs within a team solely as an individual.

[/quote]CHOMMMSKIIIII....................I concur with my entire being.

[quote user="GRAW2ROBZ"]

At the moment I have 73 wins and 94 losses. But of those 94 losses, tons of those are second or third place in full lobbies. Only a couple are DNF.

[/quote]

But how many of those 73 were legit in 3/4 full lobbies?