XBOX One Is Garbage

"Lets not call any game garbage" - Vincent

Garbage garbage garbage!


"Why shouldn't it be on the Xbox One? Because the graphics aren't great?" - Shaggy2000

Because it's garbage?
I don't recall going the "It's not 1080p!" route. If that was the reason, almost everything on the One would belong on the 360, but then most of it is anyways. lol

The real question... is why can't Microsoft and Sony (as so many games are on both platforms) make some rules for developers regarding the quality of games, such as only allowing smaller updates when they are first released so that games ship with fewer
bugs.

Because as soon as Sony or MS starts laying down strict rules then said dev runs to the media complaining (whining) about restrictions to their artistic method. Media publishes slanted articles on the "corporate/draconian bootstomping". Gamers "lap up" said
articles and quickly point fingers to the bad corporate machinery as the purveyor of all the problems. Also, dev/pub blames long delays in anticipated game release dates on MS/Sony. Thus impatient gamers and media start pointing fingers of blame to restrictive
corporate practices.

The real question is: why do gamers pre-order games? Thus rewarding pubs/devs with money in the bank regardless of game quality. Can't wait one week after release to read reviews on quality and performance of a game? Why do some games that require so much
patching still get so many gamers buying their games? Shouldn't poor game testing result in products so bad that nobody buys the game? If so many gamers are buying broken games, then your argument is with the gamers as well. Because the devs/pubs seem to have
the greenlight to patch often, so they will continue to do so.

As to the process of patching. I believe some of the methods are a download in temp memory>find and replace certain files. I noticed game sizes not changing much even though the patch is large. For example: game is 10 GB in size. Patch for it is 4 GB. When
the patching is done, game is now 10.8 GB. Thus, the patch may be adding some new content, but also might just be finding and replacing only certain existing files. Also, I believe some patches might be cumulative. For example: patch 1.01 is 5 GB, and six
months later patch 1.05 is 8 GB. If you have been offline for a while then you get the larger patch. And it is always the larger, more recent version.

X1 was patiented as a. "Console" but when it comes to using it as a console, without at least initial access to the net, creation of an 'online account,' HUGE console and controller updates etc. It's essentially. A Brick.

With the net, updates etc, it will run games. But works far better as an app machine and serfing the web. lol, my PC is junk, but rather than buying a new one. I simply use the X1. No need for anti virus programs etc. Sure you can't Dl PDF files etc but
it does save you a tone of $ in that respect. So it's not entirely garbage.

Wait wait wait wait........they have internet in Australia?

Sucks you feel that way, I personally love it.

Lol, yes but it's pronounced Inunet. Hey, after allot of travel I haven't experienced better internet in other countries, it's just expensive here.

I agree to a point that MS is responsible to push everything towards internet in a way - that everybody with just normal internet, thinking occational GB downloads, is left in vain.

No move of much stuff to usb, like 360 has - pushing everything to cloud or onedrive.

BC is requiring to download digitally full 360 games all over, even having disks.

I mean in many fields of commerce a seller is bound to inform what is required to use a product.

So MS should - Xbox system requirement - super duper internet, flatrate is needed to make full use of xbox one.

And many games require to be online even when playing single player.

Certain games also having online multiplayer/coop require Gold membership with annuals cost approx. $80.

Something like that, should be on every system requirement.