Who wants to see a return of the 360-era Policies?

KSI DemiURGE · Jan 22, 2019

I was once an esteemed XBOX LIVE Ambassador before trolls ruined it with excessive reporting of me for petty reasons (after all, thats what trolls do). Listen to this story i ripped from a necro’d thread :

[Mod Removed - Profanity]

I was reported by another user who first attacked me and due to the inability of the Policy Enforcement Team to follow their own listed attributes on their enforcement page I have come here to post this. The pet so called values:

"Our Values Integrity
We are accountable for our actions; we must make consistent, unbiased decisions based on the best available evidence.

Compassion
The policy is our guide. We must do what is right, not always just what is written. Context matters.

Precision
With authority comes great responsibility; we must be precise in our investigations, documentation, reporting, and application of enforcement policy.

Team
Each individual is critical to our success. Each is trusted and empowered to do what is right. We learn from mistakes and always try to improve. We care deeply about our customer’s experiences on Xbox Live and are dedicated as a team to make it a safe and
fun place to be!"

I understand the reasons for my suspension, but the inability for the Policy Enforcement Team to properly act with:

"Integrity" - the player who instigated the exchange and first harassed me remains un-banned and unpunished.

"Compassion" - Neither did you do what was right nor did you look at the context of the events even as described when you actually have a message trail you can follow, as the offending player called me a "[Mod Removed – Profanity]."

"Precision" - An obvious failure has occurred with this system of investigation and documentation if they allow players who initiate hate mail to get away with it and punish a victim who will fight back and defend themselves.

"Team" - My favorite is the part where they claim to care about he customer's experience, yet they ban me, a 6+ year member for defending himself against hate mail, and I have had ruined my experience far enough due to belligerent players instigating hate
constantly. I'm sure anyone who works at this SJW reddit fuelled sociology graduate PET must be aware of things such as these by now https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incitement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inchoate_offense

This offending player displayed both mens rea and actus reas; and yet still goes unpunished!

The Policy Enforcement Team's inability to act appropriately has cost them not one, but two accounts now. Both the account Perfect Dark 51 and Starboss47 will be terminated due to the inability of the Policy Enforcement Team to act in fairness, this complaint
will also be sent to every single place I can put it, good day

* Moved from Community Participation Center

:)

Zero Jehuty

Then next time just block and report. There is no reason to react to a person.

Anything that is a nasty word or used to GET AROUND that breaks the rules.

You agreed to these rules when you made your account. You then picked to break them.

KSI DemiURGE

But i never retaliated

My case differs because i was trolled into suspension for using acronyms.

Since when has it ever been against the Policy to use an acronym to save time while playing in an online game?

It has never been against the policy to use an acronym in the context that i have. How would you feel if, hypothetically, you had used the acronym "CT[mod removed] LM[mod removed]O" and been reported for it and thus been
suspended? Doesn't feel to good does it?

Welcome to my position.

And furthermore this issue has caused me to lose my ambassador status. not cool considering i have a recorded stream of how it went down. Shows i never retaliated.

Njal the Blue

As someone who was an Ambassador, you should know and understand that retaliation is just the same as starting the "attack" There is no justification for violating the code of conduct.

Smwutches

But i never retaliated

My case differs because i was trolled into suspension for using acronyms.

Since when has it ever been against the Policy to use an acronym to save time while playing in an online game?

It has never been against the policy to use an acronym in the context that i have. How would you feel if, hypothetically, you had used the acronym "[Mod Removed – Profanity]
[Mod Removed – Profanity]" and been reported for it and thus been suspended? Doesn't feel to good does it?

Welcome to my position.

That's always been a policy in the code of conduct.

denis97g

I think the policies work perfectly, the enforcement team checks every report and acts accordingly. if you respect the ToS you won't have any problem.

Who wants to see a return of the 360-era Policies?