Using an Xbox One without Xbox Live Gold.

Hahaha. "Let me Google that for ya."

Sorry, I'll try Youtube instead... Hang on!

 

Sure hope this works.



Me'sa 1st vid on YT. may have to pause in order to READ.

 

Humm. Don't seem to be working so I'll try again.

 

"This video has been removed by the user"...

You're really just wasting your time anyway. I saw the ad too, but I actually scrolled down to read the whole thing. As I said, the fact that an active subscription is required is not some huge secret or conspiracy as you've tried to make it out to be.

 

Yes it is a 'huge secret or *consspiracy' (*Tin foil hat tactic ... Name calling... often used by those who worship the ground none existant entities walks on to divert attention/blame away from their god.)

On the surface of the ad, no mentian that free games actually means. Game rentals.

Subsurface, again. No mentian of it.

It's not until you dive THREE phatoms down into the ad, that you'll find out that free games actually means free game rentals.

Attention spans in some 80% or more of the population is short. So hiding things three phatoms down in and ad is in fact not only a *conspiracy. It's false and intentionally missleading, can't blame that on human error, advertising.

Oh: tell your god that their nothing anyone can do about it, for in this age. Big gobernment and Too Big to Jail are two sides of the same corrupt coin.

Hows that for a *conspiracy!

 

Wow... Yup, you've lost it. Thanks for the conformation. Have a good night!

 

You have a good night as well CodeCat5.

 

"Yes it is a 'huge secret or *consspiracy' (*Tin foil hat tactic ... Name calling... often used by those who worship the ground none existant entities walks on to divert attention/blame away from their god.)"

^ So... Name calling, huh? Now it's my turn to say "Prove it". You can't, because I did not call you any names. Seriously, where do you even get this stuff from?

As for your *none* existent entities... I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, ignore the amusing typo, and just say that you assume entirely too much in your extremely strange and off topic rant if you think I subscribe to any particular religion. I'm
also going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you must be beyond drunk considering the number of misspellings and flat out irrational ramblings of that post. Come back when you're sober.

 

Misspelling. conspiracy etc, etc, etc.

Yes ColdCat, I can't spell for spit.

But, wouldn't it be nice, aside from my short comings to have a conversation without all the attacks, whether implies, or direct, on a person characture or intent just because you might not not agree with said persons thoughts and/opinions?

Most likely misspelled everything yet again. But ask me if I care?

The religious thing came from Genchy when he said. 'corporate satanism.' - Since he said that I thought about it, and my conclusion was that Microsoft is not a god, their products are not shrines, their software and/or TOU/COC policies isn't unfailable religious
text.

So forgive me for having that on my mind when responding to you.

Good night!

 

Nice attempt at a play on words with the "Cold"cat part. </sarcasm>

I may not sugar coat my words, but that doesn't mean I'm attacking. If I was attacking, believe me, there would be no doubt about it. If you think my posts were an attack, then your skin is entirely too thin for the internet.

Still waiting for that proof of "name calling". If you're going to accuse me of something, at least have the common decency to back up your words as I did.

Not sure why you feel the need to project your religious thoughts in a post towards me when apparently it was directed at someone 10 posts prior, but ok.... Perhaps next time you should attempt to post your thoughts in a somewhat logical order to alleviate
confusion.

Forgive me for having thoughts of insanity on my mind after reading your reply... But hey, if the shoe fits...

 

CodeCat was your choice in account names. Just because I left the 5 off of it means NOTHING. Most here refer to me as Electro, but that don't bother me in the least. If I miss spelled I am sorry.

"Still waiting for that proof of "name calling". -

Whether express, written or implied. Referring to someone as. "beyond drunk" - "conspiracy" - as in theorist. Or tin foil hat guy - "irrational ramblings" - "misspellings" and the like, in no way adds substance to a conversation, but rather. Is a direct
attack on a persons character. And for what purpose?

To win an argument perhaps?

If so, then you're in an argument with no-one but yourself.

Oh, and my skin is thick not thin. If it were thin I would have reported your remarks as spam/abuse as opposed to standing nose to nose and pointing out to you DIRECTLY those facts.

Now, if you wish to have a proper discussion beyond this point. Then by all means lets do so. If not, then carry on with your bad self.

Oh, and I switched from IE to Chrome so as to have spell check and thus better allowing readers to fully comprehend this text. Don't plan to use it anymore today, but we'll see.

 

Reading back over my earlier comment. I did in fact misspell your name. Which was completely unintentional.

IE via the 360 don't leave much room on chatpad for my fingers to hit every letter perfectly one handed.