RYSE Son Of Rome STUTTER

Think that was his name lol

 

I don't know about that. I watched some videos of his that tested the frame rate in Halo: The Master Chief Collection's various levels, and it matched my gameplay nearly perfectly.

 

@Dufful, yea thats the only bit I could think of but there wasn't loads of fog in the player areas, a bit of atmosphere in the trees maybe. Either way couldn't care less what some internet article says, would rather rely on first hand experience. Both
my playthroughs (and MP) I never noticed any noticeable frame rate issues and dont recall anyone else having any on my FR.

 

Only playing through about halfway (mostly I find the Game utterly boring) I have never once noticed any drop in quality of Frame Rate or Graphic fidelity. It remains very consistent and solid from what I have seen.

Too bad its just a really bad Game.

 

Awesome game that is fun to play.

Some people find killing people as a Roman Soldier to be somewhat repetitative.

For the rest of us... that's why be bought the game.

If it's not your cup of tea I can respect that.

But trying to say it's a bad game because it's not your cup of tea is just inviting people to mock you.

With the amount that you've played you're like those people who packed in the original "Dead Rising" before getting Frank past level 1. Still I understand not playing it if you're not enjoying it.

 

Sorry Azrael008uk, that is not correct. You are not the Game, If I say it is a "bad" Game that is nothing towards those that enjoy it. I simply do not.

Further, no I do not believe someone needs to "keep trying" something in order to give their Opinion on something. That is an old and dried Topic that has been well addressed time and time again.

 

I am talking about the second half of the game, even if it's the first one. FPS drops are there, and the biggest gaming sites on earth have confirmed it. Yes , sure, you might not have noticed them, they're there, period. Your xbox is the same as everyone
else's, I don't care what anyone says, I trust pros that analyse footage all day long. It all comes down to TV , viewing distance and so on. That being said, ryse is an awesome game, definately no major fps drops, but the game is def averaging at 26-28 fps
witch is playable indeed. It's not when the game came out, it's how the game was pushed out the door. That's why there's bugs and so on, and yes, the guy who said the fps drops were noticeable post the dlc release is on spot.

 

Anyway we've dragged this on for longer than needed. You can discuss other games if you feel like it, I'm done beating that dead horse that's full of concrete proof.

 

You keep saying concrete proof yet have offered us none except your word that these sites said it was true. First the game was made to run at 30fps. Now your telling us that it dips to 26-28 fps, really? If you can even physically notice 2-4 frames while
playing a game, you seriously must have some dam amazing eye sight! Sounds to me like really trying to get a Ryse out of people

 

I have offered you tons, ign, digital foundry and many more, including gamespot. As well as reviews on youtube. The game was made to run at 30 fps, WAHAH, seriously ? Is that even a serious response. Yes pal, Unity was also made to run at 30 frames, you
probably think that's smooth too, and somehow in the process of mass production your xbox one got to have a different hardware and now it runs games reaal smooth when they actually run sub-30-20 frames ? Cmon.. and yes you can notice anything below 29 fps
in games, YOU CAN. Somebody who's played enough knows what sub30 feels like, and I've already confirmed it with dozens of people. If you like to believe the sites are somehow paid by sony to offer inconclusive or false reviews, okay bud. If you like to believe
your xbox one runs the game differently than everyone else's - again, okay bud. You probably don't notice any frame rate drops even in the turret sections when it runs so poorly that it's pointless to talk about it as every angry reviewer on youtube has already
stated the obvious. My xbox one is perfect btw, considering that it runs every other game with no fps drops and the only game that runs with them, is the one confirmed to have that particular problem, so - please, stop. Friends, sites, youtube all kinds of
places have confirmed it and they have done NUMEROUS FRAME RATE TESTS, examples of the most obvious frame rate drops - TURRET sections, the forest (green forest level , not the grayish one) when you're passing through that little alley full of hanging bodies,
it drops to 24 fps in that instance as every single frame rate test can attest to it. There's def more, I just can't think of them right now. Aside from that, the game also has inconsistent fps in other places with little to no AI. Why don't you try going
through thousands of youtube comments/ reviews saying the game drops frames throughout the game and drops to 16 frames per second in the first turret section. Ha... I guess you got the Major Nelson special edition xbox one.

 

^ you Sir are a complete Binner.

 

Hahahaha! Mate I tell you what. Go to compare games with me and see who has put more hours into that game! I have over 22000 kills in that game. I have played it more than every single person I know. Actually you would be hard pressed to find a single person
on this forum that has put as many hours into it so don't sit there and tell me about Ryse. I know the fps dips a bit but your making it out like its dropping to 5 frames the way your going in about it. Personally I havnt experienced it as bad as your making
it out to be. And the fact that it was a release title does make a difference. Being unfamiliar with the hardware meant devs couldn't get the full potential out of the Xbox one. So don't sit there with your condescending tone and talk to me as if I don't know
what I'm talking about. Just cause read something doesn't make the knowledge yours! I'm speaking from countless hours of personal experience!

 

While we were undoubtedly impressed with the visuals on display in Ryse, performance is one area where Crytek has fallen a bit short. Originally touted as a solid 30fps experience, Ryse misses the mark more often than we'd like with frame-rates often fluctuating
between 26-28fps. The most challenging situations even see the frame-rate drop into the teens, though such moments are few and far between and often kick in during engine-generated cut-scenes, so there is no actual impact on playability. While drops occurring
during the opening bridge sequence - with hundreds of troops on screen - seem reasonable we've also observed dips in areas with little to no combat.

oh look the article says "though such moments are few and far between and often kick in during engine generated cut-scenesm so there is no actual impact on playability". That will be why anyone who actually has played the game (as opposed to a fool quoting
from Internet YouTube experts) never actually noticed frame rate issues.

Digital Foundry vs. Ryse: Son of Rome

 

And you Sir, are in denial mode.

 

WAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHH The most challenging situations even see the frame-rate drop into the teens, though such moments are few and far between and often kick in during engine-generated cut-scenes, so there is no actual impact on playability. While drops
occurring during the opening bridge sequence - with hundreds of troops on screen - seem reasonable we've also observed dips in areas with little to no combat.