Ghosts is a great game

If it was 2009. For a true next gen experience bF4 is where it's at

:)

 

Call oF Duty Ghosts

HOLY SHIXXX WHAT A GREAT TRAILER FOR GHOST!!! MAY 21 ANNOUNCEMENT PAIRED WITH THE GHOST GAME PREVIEW IS GONNA BE CRAZY!!!!

 

From MW3 to Ghosts

Mw3 was the first cod game i ever played. Went straight from mw3 to ghosts. I gotta say, i loved mw3 and i LOVE ghosts! Squads is so fun and addicting. What a great feature to upgrade your squad as you please! Challenging offline friends and practicing
game modes against and with AI bots is great! I suggest buying this game if youre hesitant. Its alot of fun

 

Move along people, nothing to see here.

 

shhhhhh! they dont need to know that!

 

On the One, BF4 looks and sounds great, but I don't understand why it still handles like ***.

.

Why is that?

 

Seriously, it is soo clunky. I started playing it this week on the one. Aiming and moving around is horrendous. You can't even tell when you are lagging because the game is so awkward.....but as bob said above it is a beautiful game visually.

It's cool to get immersed into a game of bf4, but it is a completely different game than cod. Cod is above fast paced, twitch aiming. Battlefield is about vehicles and strategy (what they call camping in cod). Battlefield is fun, but the learning curve
is much steeper than COD. People complain about ghosts maps being too big and slow paced...lol, stay away from bf.

 

It's that time again I see...

 

Actually BF4 is WAAAAYYYY better than BF3 or BFBC2. Those games were more "clunky". I think BF4 plays pretty smoothly. Its not as smooth and fast as CoD, but its a TON better than the recent past with BFs. Much better now. Now if BF4 played as fast and smooth
as CoD, that would be amazing.

 

ur mum's a gr8 game, i played her all night #rekt #goml #kumquats

 

Wow, what a cool individual.

 

Sounds like a worthwhile dude.

 

[quote user="UneasyJmitchell"]

Actually BF4 is WAAAAYYYY better than BF3 or BFBC2. Those games were more "clunky". I think BF4 plays pretty smoothly. Its not as smooth and fast as CoD, but its a TON better than the recent past with BFs. Much better now. Now if BF4 played as fast and smooth
as CoD, that would be amazing.

[/quote]

The previous battlefields weren't even worth the time. 12 v 12 on gigantic maps with several vehicles was straight up boring. They were cool to pop in and be impressed by the size and beauty for a few matches and then trade it right back in. Now with
large number of players and 60 fps this game is a legit monster. But when you are spoiled with the smoothness that is COD, it is hard to go to battlefield. COD matchmaking/party system is amazing compared to bf4. It can be difficult to get into a match
on battlefield 4. Any time, day or night you can get into several cod matches in the bat of an eye. You can get a full party of friends and hop right in. As far as I can tell, battlefield has no party system....what a blunder. COD is so successful because
it is easy and smooth. With the added players in bf4 and the upgrade to 60 fps it is now playable. The next step is to work out the kinks and release a full battlefield game. People say COD is rushed....but really battlefield seems more rushed in comparison.
Regardless, I'm glad to have both franchises and I'm excited to see what they will do in the next few releases.

 

I want a combo of both games (the best of each) LOL. Maybe Titanfall, dunno?

 

@Bob - The most worthwhile of the worthwhile from what I've heard.