ghost quality failing under expectations

Can someone please elaborate why this game, "call of duty GHOSTS" is cheating us as gamers in so many ways?

1.) Overall quality is looking like a generic Black Ops by treyarch as opposed to the so deserved follow up graphics of Modern Warfare 3 by Infinity ward?

2.) More " Hackers and cheaters" being allowed to jump to the top of the leaderboards when they have not put in the time required to deserve the right to " be on top" of everyone else, being us loyal gamers in general speaking?

3.) We pay 60+ dollars for a game that is not was to be expected, I among many feel like a refund should be granted for cheating us out of a misdirected game?

4.) furthermore cheating us out of this darn " server connection problems of not being able to connect to the call of duty server " ?,..Along with " lost connection to hosts, and or " timed out " , causing us to obtain a loss or unfinished match while in
the mist of a ongoing match?

5.) Corruption has been planned before the holidays to steal and deprive us of our hard earned money by promoting a game that is not what it was supposed to be, we wanted another Modern Warfare 3 spinoff, or at least a similar comparability of graphics
and game play?

:)

 

Infinity Ward: there's "a lot of potential" for Kinect in Call of Duty gameplay on Xbox One

It's a good approach. I don't have high expectations for its integration in Ghosts, but we'll see.

 

Murdered Soul Suspect

From what i saw and read this game is under my expectation...Arf.

 

[quote user="Kameron Island"]

Can someone please elaborate why this game, "call of duty GHOSTS" is cheating us as gamers in so many ways?

1.) Overall quality is looking like a generic Black Ops by treyarch as opposed to the so deserved follow up graphics of Modern Warfare 3 by Infinity ward?

I really dont see any big difference in graphics over the last 7 years. the only thi ng I think has changed drastically is that teyarch games have become less dark and dreary ...... something that I kind of preferred, but many
disliked.

2.) More " Hackers and cheaters" being allowed to jump to the top of the leaderboards when they have not put in the time required to deserve the right to " be on top" of everyone else, being us loyal gamers in general speaking?

Hackers and cheaters have been at the top of the leaderboards for years ..... why would yo expect any different?

3.) We pay 60+ dollars for a game that is not was to be expected, I among many feel like a refund should be granted for cheating us out of a misdirected game?

Again ..... what is so different that suddenly you deserve a refund. If you've played it before, you should expect the same things. Basically .... you knew what you were getting when you paid for it.

4.) furthermore cheating us out of this darn " server connection problems of not being able to connect to the call of duty server " ?,..Along with " lost connection to hosts, and or " timed out " , causing us to obtain a loss or unfinished match while in
the mist of a ongoing match?



This may be the case for you, but personally I have had less connection issues with ghosts than ever. That leads me to believe that its not a problem with the game, but our internet providers, Sometimes things dont have to
be broke to not work properly. Thgere are a lot of varuiables that are out of the control of eiother the gamers or the devs,

5.) Corruption has been planned before the holidays to steal and deprive us of our hard earned money by promoting a game that is not what it was supposed to be, we wanted another Modern Warfare 3 spinoff, or at least a similar comparability of graphics
and game play?

Based on what I have read on these forums, mw3 doesnt hit the top of very many peioples list. I'll take ghosts over mw3 or bo2 any day.

[/quote]

 

I want my money back from the new Hobbit movie, not worth the bandwidth to torrent even......

 

What Atog said,What d'you expect from CoD?

 

Yeah, CoDs never been perfect, but its definately worth the money as far as game time is concerned. I remember having to put quarters in video games at the arcade for about 10 minutes of gameplay.

 

^ Dragons Lair cost 50 cent and your lucky if you lived 30sec............

 

I beat that game. It was the cartoon thingy and you would have to hit the joystick for a direction or the X button for action at a certain time. That was great graphics for a game at that time.

 

play.google.com/.../details

 

Never played dragons lair. My arcade days went through duck hunt, pacman, frogger, qix, defender and asteroids. Asteroids was probably my main one I played aside from pinball and pool.

I was in wildwood about 20 years ago and we saw this 3d holographic game. It was similar to the streetfighter game, but your character was a greenish colored hologram that actually appeared on top of the table. ...... pretty cool, but havent seen anything
like it since.

 

It was the same era at the other arcade games, but a Disney movie you could interact with, why it looks years ahead of its time.

 

Of course poker machines were popular most of the places I went. You could find them easier than all the others except maybe pacman.

 

Space Invaders was the biggy that I remember first.

 

yeah ....... I forgot that one. It was the first arcade game I played and put a lot of time and quarters into it...... probably more than any of the ones that followed.