coin rip off not posting what I won

Tell your friend to buy it online, if he feels so ripped off.

You can't flip a coin and hope to get both heads and tails.

Someone created a thread on this exact same topic yesterday. I think getting coins taken away for completing games is rubbish. It seems like EA wants you to either beat your opponent into submission or make you tap out. Whoever idea that feature was should've
been fired awhile ago. I actually think I should be rewarded for playing a tight game all the way to the end

No, it doesn't affect your coins anyway. As for the statistics, this is what it says for me:-

Challenges won 834

Challenges played 694

Days completed 166

Bronze badges won 6

Silver badges won 6

Gold badges won 5

coins for this month 16,350.

How I can win more than I've played, I don't know !! But, as you probably know the statistics sometimes play up. I did have a fastest time of 1.09 mins on freecell, but a couple of months back all my statistics changed and now I have a fastest time of
1.25 mins.

And, the with daily total of 900 coins to be won, they have made the silver badge requirement at 12,000 and gold at 20,000 coins. Interesting and fun.

My point is that paying for Xbox Gold provides you access to the online services that exist at any given moment in time. It does not guarantee that those services will always exist. It cannot guarantee that, because those services are not governed by Microsoft.
If one game's service goes down, your Gold membership is still fulfilling its duty by providing you access to all the then currently available multiplayer services. It's not the Xbox Gold Black Ops Membership. It's not the Xbox Gold Rainbow Six Membership.
Whether you play it for one game or not, the Xbox Gold membership applies to whatever multiplayer titles are currently available on the network.

-

The idea that game companies are thinking about closing down their servers because, maybe their parent company made a business decision to close its doors, or maybe the server population is down and they can't justify the costs to maintain servers. Businesses
have decisions to make. They can't have Microsoft calling them on the phone saying "Hey wait a second, guys. You can't make any business changes because we've got people who just started their Gold memberships."

-

Now, if you're saying that this is a discussion about whether or not it's right for Xbox to charge for multiplayer, I can understand where you're coming from. You want a gaming platform that delivers online multiplayer for free. There are companies that
offer this. It's a perfectly valid alternative. Xbox doesn't offer that. We're all welcome to choose the platform that best fits our expectations. I play on multiple platforms. I'm glad the others are free, because if they charged, I wouldn't choose them
over Xbox. With PS4 charging for online multiplayer, I'm certainly not going to get a PS4. I will choose Xbox over Sony in that decision. But that's my preference, based on my opinions. Companies are free to build the business model they want, and Xbox
has been rewarded with many millions of customers who, like me, feel satisfied with what we get for our money.

-

As for analogies... seriously, they don't have to carry that far. But I'd mentioned that a business might purchase the property where a bus stop was, changing the landscape, and the available activities at that former destination, thus no longer granting
access to the route that one took before. The idea of being dropped off a block and a half down the road was to liken it to "Sorry, Black Ops no longer has that functionality, but Black Ops 2 does." As if a very similar experience on a slightly different
game might be akin to being dropped off just a block and half away from where you're used to going.